Friday, 23 April 2010
Wednesday, 21 April 2010
What is a story...?
- Classic Story: Beginning - Middle - End
- Plotpoints
- Characters
- Word of Mouth: gossip, folk tales
- Written: parchment, books, Greek Mythology, Walls (hieroglyphics and cave paintings).
- Books,
- Poems,
- Film,
- Television,
- Radio and
- Music.
Here, Alfred Hitchock describes it perfectly, showing that just by changing the middle shot (of what he was smiling at), it changed the character from an old, endearing man to an old pervy man. If we used this in Lazy days - changing the shot of the television to a blank shot, it would have changed the whole point to our film as he would appear as if he was imagining something that we couldn't see.
Tzvetan Topdorov - He believed that in a storyline there was a balance (equillibrium) that was unbalanaced by the (disequillibrium).
The Equillibrium of Lazy Days would be the character's everyday life - stable and 'normal'. The Disequillibrium of Lazy Days would be the TV following the character around everywhere.
Influences
Having scrapped the idea of Tramps, we were back to base one until, Simon and his brother were chatting and saying how weird it would be if the TV followed them. The concept was simplistic yet quirky.
Gritty, feature length film "Withnail and I" was our basis for inspiration for "Lazy Days". With its bleak appearance and mundain feel, we chose to incorporate this throughout our production: sticking to its key theme of being a bum, drunk and lazy just does not bode well for the modern lifestyle. The country-western music we used showed resemblance to that of the music at 7:07min of Part 2 of "Withnail and I".
The idea that consumerism is taking over this generations' lives is made apparent in the film "Killing Time At Home", another of our influences. We wanted to convey that technology is taking over our lives - albeit in a slightly more comical way, but still hopefully getting the point across to audiences.
Tuesday, 20 April 2010
Lazy days - Distribution
The best place to find short films is on the internet as it such a vast portal for exhibiting your talent these days - being able to upload videos and work you have done onto not only your own website but big productions such as Youtube and Vimeo too, some stars becoming famous for their videos such as Chris Crocker for his pro-Britney Spears Videos and Esmee Denters for her singing videos.
Individually, all three of us posted our video onto our Facebook asking for some feedback from friends. As i did not recieve a lot of great feedback , I reposted it twice more receiving minimal constructive critisism, again. It was then uploaded onto the Internet, on the BDC playlist and we tried to uplaod via. Louis’ account, trying to get as much publicity as possible.
Other than promoting your piece you can also enter film festivals, but the more prestigious they are, you tend to have to pay a fee to enter, so we researched some free competitions, designed for our age (also that were free) and we found "Future shorts", of which submitted our via a Youtube link.
We sent "Lazy Days to" Future shorts and recieved a comfirmation email via. Louis' email saying:
"Dear Louis Spanswick O'Brien
Thank you for submitting Lazy Days to us, If you chosen to submit DVD copy of your film, please send it clearly marked with your submission number to: FUTURE SHORTS, 71 Leonard Street, London, EC2A 4QU We look forward to receiving your film.
Please note that we cannot return preview copies. Sub,mission ID: 0000005520 All the best, Future Shorts Programming."
...We are yet to hear back from them yet, so fingers crossed...
To distribute a short film you have to get your name and short(s) well known. The easiest and most frequently used is uplodaing onto a free online streaming websites such as youtube vimeo and veoh, as previously stated we've already submitted our work onto youtube, vimeo. As a group we submitted Lazy Days into free competitions as previously stated (Future Shorts), we then submitted to the BBC film network. This is because the BBC is a globally well known and prestigious corporation, with a lot of opportunities for rising talent (The BBC Blast Network - for teenagers of all ages).
Audiences
The fact that we are aiming it at a more niche audience, people who are interested in short film specifically 20 – 35 year olds, as opposed to a mainstream audience means that we haven't had create the film for the majority but for short film enthusiasts, looking for something new and quirkier. The soudntrack used, may attract a slightly older audience too, perhaps interested in the old country and rhythmn & blues genre, which is probably quite misguiging as you would hear that sort of music in a western film: breaking the sterotype boundries.
Tuesday, 30 March 2010
Evaluation and final thoughts of "Lazy Days"...
Overall, I think it is an extremely tight and slick video. The editing in particular was the key to its success, with its slick continuity of the stalker shots and jokey music playing in unison this really enhanced the comical theme. Its slow paced, 'lazy' feel really enhances the post-student lifestyle of the character. The use of the actor himself worked really well aswell, as it did not just look as though we picked one of our friends; we picked a person who looked the part of the post-student, early twenty something. This really made the piece look authentic and not just getting one of our friends in to do the job.
The lighting worked well overall except for a few shots could have been improved a little with a better light source, but having said this we wanted the effect that the household wass dark and mundain, hinting that he is a poor 'bum' (after student life). We could have used better light sources to iluminate the character slightly better, but still have kept the cool and lonely look by using a blue 'lighting gel' to make it seem colder, having said this, at the time of filming it did not seem as dark as it did when we recorded out onto the Macs, which is a shame as it would have looked a lot more professional.
It was hard getting the continuity just right, cutting from the appearing and disappearing shots of the television, especially with the outside one, as the timing and movement of his body turning back to go outside took so long to line up. We managed to get it near about dead on, which worked out to look like a professionally cut sequence. The fades between these shots worked well too as jump cuts did NOT look professional enough so we therefore had to in order for it to look appealing. Having said this, we did not realise at the time but one of the fades were longer than we thought, loosing interest from our audience a little (what we recieved as feedback from the Questionaires). Having shots of him doing day-to-day things in between the funny shots would have dragged out the film, although the soundtrack became repetititve, and started to grate on some the audience members.
One of the main problems in our film A few other comments we gained from the Questionaires from the year 12 students were mainly to do with the ending and how it could have been a lot more engaging, as it dragged out a lot more than needed. Perhaps shortening it, and adding another low opacity shot could have improved on the look, but having said this i think that if we were to do this, it would have become repetitive and amateur looking too.
We used a lot of medium and long shots as we wanted to capture the lonlieness of him sitting watching television all day, doing nothing else. We had problems with the camera and the boom kept getting in shot, so in one scene the camera jumps awkwardly as we had to stretch out the shot to make it cut out, but I think this raw effect, makes it appear grittier and imperfect like his mundain life. They all worked really effectively, capturing the action and that feeling of solitude that the character felt as his life was sucked in by consumerism and boredom. We took influences from the animation “Killing Time at Home”, which showed how the modern day man cna get sucked into the new technology and how it can almost become an adiction.
It tied in with the basic codes and conventions of a short film, due to the simple fact that it is under 50 minutes long and that it is slightly less conventional like a classic mainstream story (beginning middle and an ending. Problem in the middle which gets resolved at the end).The majority of the short films we wtached had a underlying message, whether it be subtle or obvious, this is what sets aside short films to mainstream blockbusters. I believe our production captured quite a few moral messages:
- Technology is taking over our lives, and its grip on society today is getting slightly ridiculous (playing on the comedy theme - rather like the work of )
- Technology is everywhere, we can not get away from it.
- We live in an adictive and compulsive time
- Lazy people are haunted by their idleness.
As you can see, many key points are arisen from our short film, and can be interpretted in many differnet ways...depending on who watches, and how intently they look into it.
I think I could have had more of a role in the editting side to the project, having said this I did contribute as much as I could have given the lessons i was away for due to illness, which is a shame. I did come in and have a little editting session in my own time to tweak the overall film - without changing too much. It almost shows a piece of us as people too as we are all quite laid back etc, so its a little piece of us in the film which is a great way to end the year...it has broadened my mind to a hwole new world of films, whilst also inspiring me to be more open minded and creative with future university products which i love.